2025 Supreme(US)(cadc) 59
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT
J.G.G. – Appellant
Versus
Donald Trump – Respondent
Appellees
v. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al.,
Appellants ------------------------------ Consolidated with 25-5068
BEFORE: Henderson, Millett, and Walker*, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Upon consideration of the emergency motions for stay, the opposition thereto, the reply, and the Rule 28(j) letters; the amicus brief filed by South Carolina, Virginia, and other states; the motion to participate as amicus curiae filed by Rep. Brandon Gill and the lodged amicus brief; and the motion for leave to participate as amicus curiae filed by State Democracy Defenders Fund and former government officials and the lodged amicus brief, it is
ORDERED that the motions to participate as amicus curiae be granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged amicus briefs. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the emergency motions for stay be denied. Separate concurring statements of Judge Henderson and Judge Millett and a dissenting statement of Judge Walker are attached.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk
BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk * Judge Walker dissents from the denial of the emergency motions for stay. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring statement:
I. BACKGROUND
A. Statutory Background
In 1798, our fledgling Republic was consumed with fear. Fear of external war with France. Fear of internal strife from her sympathizers. And, for the incumbent Federalist party, fear of its chief political rival: the Jeffersonian Republicans. In the summer of 1798, the Federalists decided to kill two birds with one stone. In a series of laws known as the Alien and Sedition Acts, the Federalists granted the administration of President John Adams sweeping authority to expel immigrants, gag the free press and rid themselves of two key pillars of Republican support—immigrant voters and partisan newspapers. At the same time, these laws would purge the country of reviled Jacobin sympathizers.
Under the first of these laws, the Alien Friends Act, the
Congress granted the President sweeping power to detain and
expel any alien he deemed “dangerous to the peace and safety
of the United States.” Act of June 25, 1798, ch. 58., 1 Stat.
570. Under the Sedition Act, the Congress made it a crime to
“write, print, utter or publish . . . any false, scandalous and
malicious writing or writings against” the government, the
Congress or the President, “with intent to defame . . . or to
bring them . . . into contempt or disrepute, or to excite against
them . . . the hatred of the [] people.” Act of July 14, 1798, ch.
74, 1 Stat. 596. Both laws were enacted by narrow margins,
widely derided as unconstitutional and allowed to lapse once
the Federalists were swept from power in the elections of 1800.
A third law, the Alien Enemies Act, offered a wartime
counterpart to the Alien Friends Act. That law granted the
President the power to detain and expel enemy aliens during
times of war, invasion or predatory incursion. See Act of July
2
6, 1798, ch. 66, 1 Stat. 577. Unlike its counterparts, the Alien
Enemies Act was never questioned by Jefferson or Madison—
the de facto leaders of the Republicans—“nor did either ever
suggest its repeal.” Ludecke v. Watkins,