Appellee

v. Scott Bessent, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, et al.,

Appellants

BEFORE: Katsas*, Childs, and Pan, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the emergency motion for stay, the opposition thereto, and the reply, and the February 11, 2025 letter, it is

ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that this appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants have not shown that the district court’s February 10, 2025 minute order, which entered a three-day administrative stay to afford time to consider appellee’s motion for a temporary restraining order, had the effect of granting an injunction that is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (holding that the party asserting jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing it). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent appellants request mandamus relief, that request be denied. Appellants have not shown that they are entitled to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the Dist. of Columbia, 542