SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(US)(cadc) 113

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT
National Treasury Employees Union – Appellant
Versus
Donald J. Trump – Respondent


____________ No. 25-5157 September Term, 2024

1:25-cv-00935-PLF

Filed On: May 16, 2025

National Treasury Employees Union,

Appellee

v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.,

Appellants

BEFORE: Henderson, Walker, and Childs*, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and an immediate administrative stay, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for stay be granted. The Government has met the requirements for a stay pending appeal. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009). A stay applicant must show that (1) it “is likely to succeed on the merits,” (2) it “will be irreparably injured absent a stay,” (3) a stay will not “substantially injure” other interested parties, and (4) a stay is in the “public interest.” Id.

1. The Government is likely to prevail in its appeal of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top