SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(cafc) 82

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Voice Tech Corp. – Appellant
Versus
Unified Patents LLC – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VOICE TECH CORP., Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee ______________________

2022-2163 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020- 01018. ______________________

Decided: August 1, 2024 ______________________

ERIC MICHAEL ADAMS, Tumey LLP, Houston, TX, ar- gued for appellant.

ADAM LLOYD ERICKSON, Haynes and Boone, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ANGELA M. OLIVER; DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, DAVID L. MCCOMBS, Dallas, TX; ROSHAN MANSINGHANI, JORDAN MICHAEL ROSSEN, Unified Patents, LLC, Chevy Chase, MD. ______________________

Before LOURIE, CHEN, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges. Case: 22-2163 Document: 44 Page: 2 Filed: 08/01/2024

2 VOICE TECH CORP. v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC

CHE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top