SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(cafc) 243

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
percipient.ai Inc. – Appellant
Versus
United States – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PERCIPIENT.AI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, CACI, INC.-FEDERAL, Defendants-Appellees ______________________

2023-1970 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:23-cv-00028-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. ______________________

Decided: June 7, 2024 ______________________

SAMUEL CHARLES KAPLAN, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also rep- resented by HAMISH HUME, ERIC J. MAURER, GINA ALICIA ROSSMAN.

RETA EMMA BEZAK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY, CORINNE ANNE NIOSI.

ANNE PERRY, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Case: 23-1970

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top