SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(cafc) 35

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Indiana Municipal Power Agency – Appellant
Versus
United States – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

INDIANA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, MISSOURI JOINT MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION, NORTHERN ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER, INC., ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AGENCY, KENTUCKY MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2022-1377 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-02038-RAH, Judge Richard A. Hertling. ______________________

Decided: February 17, 2023 ______________________

PEGGY A. WHIPPLE, Healy Law Offices, LLC, Spring- field, MO, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also repre- sented by DOUGLAS HEALY; JOHN C. HAYES, JR., BRIAN J. WHITTAKER, Nixon Peabody LLP, Washington, DC.

STEVEN MICHAEL MAGER, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Case: 22-1377 Do

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top