United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CANADIAN SOLAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, CANADIAN SOLAR MANUFACTURING (CHANGSHU), INC., CANADIAN SOLAR MANUFACTURING (LUOYANG), INC., CSI SOLAR POWER (CHINA) INC., CSI-GCL SOLAR MANUFACTURING (YANCHENG) CO., LTD., CSI CELLS CO., LTD., CANADIAN SOLAR (USA), INC., SHANGHAI BYD CO., LTD., YINGLI GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CO., LTD., BAODING TIANWEI YINGLI NEW ENERGY RESOURCES CO., LTD., TIANJIN YINGLI NEW ENERGY RESOURCES CO., LTD., HENGSHUI YINGLI NEW ENERGY RESOURCES CO., LTD., LIXIAN YINGLI NEW ENERGY RESOURCES CO., LTD., BAODING JIASHENG PHOTOVOLTAIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., BEIJING TIANNENG YINGLI NEW ENERGY RESOURCES CO., LTD., HAINAN YINGLI NEW ENERGY RESOURCES CO., LTD., SHENZHEN YINGLI NEW ENERGY RESOURCES CO., LTD., YINGLI GREEN ENERGY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO., LTD., YINGLI GREEN ENERGY AMERICAS, INC., YINGLI ENERGY (CHINA) CO., LTD., CHANGZHOU TRINA SOLAR ENERGY CO., LTD., TRINA SOLAR (CHANGZHOU) SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., YANCHENG TRINA SOLAR ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., CHANGZHOU TRINA SOLAR YABANG ENERGY CO., LTD., TURPAN TRINA SOLAR ENERGY CO., LTD., HUBEI TRINA SOLAR ENERGY CO., LTD., TRINA SOLAR (U.S.) INC., SOLARWORLD AMERICAS, INC., Plaintiffs Case: 20-2162 Document: 47 Page: 2 Filed: 05/19/2023

2 CANADIAN SOLAR INTERNATIONAL v. US

NINGBO QIXIN SOLAR ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2020-2162 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in Nos. 1:17-cv-00173-CRK, 1:17-cv-00187-CRK, 1:17-cv-00193-CRK, 1:17-cv-00197-CRK, 1:17-cv-00200- CRK, Judge Claire R. Kelly. ______________________

Decided: May 19, 2023 ______________________

ADAMS LEE, Harris Bricken McVay Sliwoski, LLP, Se- attle, WA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

JOSHUA E. KURLAND, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre- sented by REGINALD THOMAS BLADES, JR., BRIAN M. BOYNTON, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY; LESLIE MAE LEWIS, Of- fice of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement & Compli- ance, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. ______________________

Before DYK, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. Case: 20-2162 Document: 47 Page: 3 Filed: 05/19/2023

CANADIAN SOLAR INTERNATIONAL v. US 3

DYK, Circuit Judge. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd. (“Qixin”) appeals a final judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”). The CIT sustained a remand determination by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) that Qixin was not eligible for a separate rate in an antidumping administrative review and held that Commerce did not err in declining to rescind the re- view. 1 On appeal, Qixin contends that (1) the CIT should have granted Qixin’s motion for leave to file new factual mate- rial and (2) Commerce should have rescinded the adminis- trative review because Commerce had determined that Qixin had made no entries during the period of review. Be- cause (1) the CIT did not abuse its discretion in denying Qixin’s motion to file new material out of time and (2) Commerce did not make a conclusive finding that Qixin had no entries in the period of review as required to rescind a review under the applicable regulation, we affirm. BACKGROUND I Commerce imposes antid