SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(cafc) 176

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Elekta Limited – Appellant
Versus
Zap Surgical Systems Inc. – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ELEKTA LIMITED, Appellant

v.

ZAP SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee ______________________

2021-1985 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019- 01659. ______________________

Decided: September 21, 2023 ______________________

JENNIFER LIBRACH NALL, DLA Piper US LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by STANLEY JO- SEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, San Diego, CA; AARON PATRICK BOWLING, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Chicago, IL.

APRIL ELIZABETH ISAACSON, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by ANDREW JAMES ISBESTER; MATTHEW MEYER, Menlo Park, CA. ______________________

Before REYNA, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit Judges. Case: 21-1985 Document: 64 Page: 2 Filed: 09/21/2023

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top