SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(scotus) 15010

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Per Curiam
Hamm – Appellant
Versus
Smith – Respondent


Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN Q. HAMM, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. JOSEPH CLIFTON SMITH ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 23–167. Decided November 4, 2024

PER CURIAM. Joseph Clifton Smith was sentenced to death for the mur- der of Durk Van Dam. The U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama vacated Smith’s death sen- tence after concluding that he is intellectually disabled. See Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U. S. 304 (2002). Smith has ob- tained five full-scale IQ scores, ranging from 72 to 78. Smith’s claim of intellectual disability depended in part on whether his IQ is 70 or below. The District Court found that Smith’s IQ could be as low as 69 given the standard error of measurement for his lowest score of 72. The Dis- trict Court then vacated the death sentence, and the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed. Smith v. Commissioner, Ala. Dept. of Corrections, 67 F. 4th 1335, 1354 (2023). Analyzing Smith’s intellectual functioning requires eval- uating his various

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top