SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Neil Gorsuch
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service – Appellant
Versus
Kirtz – Respondent
Syllabus
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL HOUSING SERVICE v. KIRTZ CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 22–846. Argued November 6, 2023—Decided February 8, 2024
The Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970, as amended by the Consumer
Credit Reporting Reform Act of 1996, allows consumers to sue lenders
who willfully or negligently supply false information about them to en-
tities that generate credit reports. Respondent Reginald Kirtz secured
a loan from a division of the United States Department of Agriculture
and later sued the agency for money damages under the FCRA. Kirtz
al
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.