SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Elana Kagan
Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Estados Unidos Mexicanos – Respondent
Syllabus
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC., ET AL. v. ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 23–1141. Argued March 4, 2025—Decided June 5, 2025 The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) bars certain lawsuits against manufacturers and sellers of firearms. As relevant, it provides that a “qualified civil liability action . . . may not be brought in any Federal or State court,” 15 U. S. C. §7902(a), and defines that term to include a “civil action or proceeding” against a firearms man- ufacturer or seller stemming from “the criminal or unlawful misuse”
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.