SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(US)(cafc) 1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Rader, Linn, Moore
Uniloc USA Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Microsoft Corp. – Respondent


632 F.3d 1292 (2011)

UNILOC USA, INC. and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Nos. 2010-1035, 2010-1055.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 4, 2011.
Rehearing Denied March 22, 2011.

*1295 Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett and Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Don O. Burley; Erik R. Puknys and Aaron J. Capron, of Palo Alto, CA. Of counsel on the brief were Paul J. Hayes and Dean G. Bostock, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo PC, of Boston, MA.

Frank E. Scherkenbach, Fish and Richardson P.C., of Boston, MA, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Kurt L. Glitzenstein; John W. Thornburgh, of San Diego, CA and Laura R. Braden, of Washington, DC.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited (collectively, "Uniloc") appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island granting Microsoft Corporation's ("Microsoft") motion for judgment as a matter of law (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top