SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Cullinane v. Uber Technologies, Inc.


          United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit

No. 16-2023

      RACHEL CULLINANE, JACQUELINE NÚÑEZ, ELIZABETH SCHAUL,
          and ROSS MCDONAGH, on behalf of themselves and
                  all others similarly situated,

                     Plaintiffs, Appellants,

                               v.

                    UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

                      Defendant, Appellee.


          APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

         [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]


                             Before

                Torruella, Thompson, and Kayatta,
                         Circuit Judges.



     Matthew W.H. Wessler, with whom Matthew Spurlock, Gupta
Wessler PLLC, John Roddy, Elizabeth Ryan, and Bailey & Glasser LLP
were on brief, for appellants.
     S. Elaine McChesney, with whom Lawrence T. Stanley, Jr.,
Emma D. Hall, and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP were on brief, for
appellee.
     Jennifer D. Bennett, Public Justice, P.C., Jonathan D.
Selbin, Jason L. Lichtman, Andrew R. Kaufman, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Jahan Sagafi, Paul W. Mo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top