COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
United States v. Wallace
17-0472
United States v. Wallace
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
3
4 August Term, 2018
5
6 (Argued: October 18, 2018 Decided: September 3, 2019)
7
8 Docket No. 17‐0472
9
10
11 _____________________________________
12
13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
14
15 Appellee,
16
17 v.
18
19 TIMMY WALLACE,
20
21 Defendant‐Appellant.
22 _____________________________________
23
24 Before:
25
26 WINTER, POOLER, Circuit Judges, and ABRAMS, District Judge.
27
28 Defendant‐Appellant Timmy Wallace appeals from a judgment of conviction
29 entered on February 13, 2017 in the United States District Court for the Southern
30 District of New York (Katherine B. Forrest, J.). Wallace was convicted after a two‐day
31 jury trial of one count of possessing a firearm and ammunition after having been
32 convicted of three serious drug offenses, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1),
33 924(e)(1), and 2. His principal argument on appeal is that the District Court erred in
34 denying his motion to suppress the firearm, because it was discovered as the result of
35 an unconstitutionally prolonged traffic stop. Wallace also challenges several of the
36 District Court’s factual findings and argues that he was improperly sentenced
37 pursuant to the enhanced sentencing provisions of the Armed Career Criminal Act
38 (“ACCA”). We affirm both the District Court’s denial of the motion to suppress and
39 Wallace’s sentence under ACCA.
Judge Ronnie Abrams, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by
designation.
1 Judge Pooler dissents in a separate opinion.
2
3 AFFIRMED.
4
5 SAGAR K. RAVI (HAGAN SCOTTEN, on the
6 brief) for Geoffrey S. Berman, UNITED STATES
7 ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
8 NEW YORK, New York, N.Y.
9
10 JONATHAN I. EDELSTEIN, EDELSTEIN &
11 GROSSMAN, New York, N.Y., for Timmy
12 Wallace.
13
14 RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge:
15 Defendant‐Appellant Timmy Wallace appeals from a judgment of conviction
16 entered on February 13, 2017, in the United States District Court for the Southern
17 District of New York (Katherine B. Forrest, J.). Wallace was convicted after a two‐day
18 jury trial of one count of possessing a firearm and ammunition after having been
19 convicted of three serious drug offenses, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1),
20 924(e)(1), and 2. The District Court determined that Wallace was subject to the
21 enhanced sentencing provisions of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18
22 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), and sentenced him principally to 15 years of imprisonment to be
23 followed by one year of supervised release. On appeal, Wallace argues that the
24 District Court erred in denying his motion to suppress the firearm and improperly
25 sentenced him under ACCA. We reject both arguments and affirm the judgment of
26 conviction.
2
1 BACKGROUND
2 I. Factual Background1
3 On the evening of May 25, 2015, Officers Harris Haskovic, Michael Monahan,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.