Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Brett Kavanaugh
Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.

(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2019                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.,

200 U. S. 321

, 337.


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

                                       Syllabus

   BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. AMERICAN
    ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS,
                  INC., ET AL.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
                 THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

         No. 19–631.      Argued May 6, 2020—Decided July 6, 2020
In response to consumer complaints, Congress passed the Telephone
  Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) to prohibit, inter alia, almost
  all robocalls to cell phones.

47 U. S. C. §227

(b)(1)(A)(iii). In 2015, Con-
  gress amended the robocall restriction, carving out a new government-
  debt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESBrett KavanaughBarr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Brett Kavanaugh
Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.