S.P.KURDUKAR, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Keshav Lal Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Special leave granted.
2. On a report lodged by Jnanendra Parchchya, Anu Mandal Padadhikari, Gooda, a case under Section 31 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 ( Act for short) was registered against Keshav Lal Thakur, the appellant herein, by Thakur Gangti Police Station and on completion of investigation a report in final form was submitted praying for his discharge on the ground that the offence was a non-cognizable one. On that report the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda, took cognizance as in his view, a prima facie case was made out against the appellant; and aggrieved thereby he moved a petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. before the Patna High Court wherein he contended, inter alia, that the cognizance was barred by limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C. A learned Judge of the High Court, who entertained the petition, ultimately dismissed the same being of the view that under Section 473 Cr.P.C. cognizance could be taken beyond the period of limitation. The above order of the High Court is under challenge before us in this appeal.
3. We need not go into the question whether in the facts of the instant case the above view of the High Court is proper or not for the im
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.