SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 756

D.P.WADHWA, K.RAMASWAMY
Madhuri Patil – Appellant
Versus
Additionalcommissioner, Tribal Development, Thane – Respondent


ORDER

This application has been filed to recall the judgment giving various directions; and to substitute in their place the directions sought for in the prayer clause of the application.

2. As regards the first prayer to recall the Order dated September 2, 1994 with regard to the grant of the caste certificates, we do not think that it is advisable to recall the order for the reason that this Court had deliberated upon the issue and entrusted the power to issue certificates of social status to a higher officer, namely, Sub-Divisional Officer, who is expected to objectively go into the question and grant or refuse to grant social status certificates. Accordingly, we reject prayer (a).

3. As regards prayer (b) read with direction No. (iv) of the Order of this Court, we too appreciate the inconvenience caused due to vast area of the State. Therefore, instead of one committee of three officers, there will be three Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committees comprising of five members with quorum of three members, as suggested in paragraph 4 of the directions, to take a decision. At Pune, Nasik and Nagpur, six Caste Scrutiny Committees for SCs., Denotified Tribes, Nomadic Tribes, Other








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top