SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 218

S.P.KURDUKAR, S.B.MAJMUDAR
K. A. Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
Susheela Bai – Respondent


Order

Leave granted.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties the appeal was finally heard today and is being disposed of by this order.

3. The appellants are the tenants in the premises situated at Secun­derabad in Andhra Pradesh. Provisions of A.P. Building (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (‘the Act’ for short) govern the relation­ship between the appellant-tenants and the respondent-landlords.

4. The short question is whether the appellant-tenants were wilful defaulters in payment of rent on which ground the decree for posses­sion has been passed by the courts below under Section 10 of the Act. The arrears of rent were from July 1988 to December 1988. The appel­lants sent a telegram dated 17th December 1988 to the respondent-landlords calling upon them to issue receipts for the rent which they had already paid apprehending that the respondents may make out a case for default in payment of rent for these relevant months. The land­lords responded by giving reply dated 19th December 1988 stating that the rent was not paid and it was not correct to say that the receipts were not issued despite payment of rent for the relevant months. Under these circumstances, th

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top