D.P.WADHWA, N.S.HEGDE
K. Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
A. Swamickan – Respondent
Judgment
D.P. Wadhwa, J.-Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras by its judgment dated April 23, 1986 in Writ Appeal declared that K. Venkatachalam, appellant before us, was not qualified to sit as a member of the Legislative Assembly in Tamil Nadu as he did not possess the basic qualifications prescribed in Clause (c) of Article 173 of the Constitution read with Section 5 of Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short ‘the Act’). The Division Bench held that the appellant was not an elector for Lalgudi Assembly Constituency and, therefore, did not possess the necessary qualification to be chosen from that constituency. High Court passed the impugned judgment in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. A single Judge of the High Court had, however, earlier dismissed the writ petition challenging the election of the appellant on the ground that it was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution in view of bar contained in Clause (b) of Article 329 of the Constitution.
2. General elections to the Legislative Assembly in Tamil Nadu were held in December, 1984 and both Venkatachalam, the appellant and Swamickan, respondent wer
N.P. Punnuswami v. The Returning Officer, Namakhal Constituency, Namakhal, Salem Distt. & Ors.
Durga Shankar Mehta v. Raghuraj Singh & Ors.
Brundaban Nayak v. Election Commission of India
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi & Ors.
Krishna Ballabh Prasad Singh v. Sub Divisional Officer, Hilsa-cum-Returning Officer & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.