D.P.MOHAPATRA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Pritpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents despite service of notice.
Leave granted.
2. The accused in the complaint case No. C-373/98 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Daltonganj, Bihar, has filed this petition assailing the order passed by the Patna High Court on 28th September, 2000 in Crl. Misc.No. 3065/2000. In that case the appellant had challenged the order of the Magistrate cancelling the bail granted to him.
3. The dispute raised in the case relates to eviction of the appellant who is the tenant from the premises of which the respondent is the owner. Previously, there was a compromise between the parties in which it was agreed inter alia that the appellant will pay certain amount to the respondent and vacate the premises by the time stipulated. On the allegation that the appellant has failed to comply with the terms of the compromise by not vacating the premises in question within the time stipulated, the petition for cancellation of bail was filed. It is stated by learned counsel for the appellant that neither any averment was made in the petition about mis-use of liberty granted to the appellant nor any difficulty was a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.