SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 160

N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Debendra Nath Pandhi – Respondent


ORDER

In this appeal, the State of Orissa has challenged the two orders made by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack; the first one dated 21.6.1999 and the second one dated 12.9.2000 made in Crl. Miscellaneous Case No. 2374 of 1995.

2. In its order dated 21.6.1999, the High Court considered a petition filed by the respondent herein seeking quashing of the charges framed against him by the Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneshwar under Section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short the Act ). By the said order, the High Court set aside the order of the Special Court dated 13.9.1993 taking cognizance of the offence as also the subsequent order dated 2.11.1993 framing charges against the respondent herein. By the said order, the learned Judge remitted the matter to the learned Special Judge with a direction to first call upon the prosecution to examine its case against the respondent herein, keeping in view the findings and observations made by the Commissioner of Income Tax in favour of the respondent herein and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the said respondent. There was a further direction to the trial Court to decide the matter by the end o
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top