SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 500

ARIJIT PASAYAT, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
State of A. P. And Govt. Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
D. Dastagiri And M. D. Mustaga – Respondent


ORDER

The State of Andhra Pradesh is before us in these appeals questioning the validity and correctness of the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court. The appellant-State Government issued a notification containing guidelines and procedure for recruitment to the post of 1715 Excise Constables, pursuant to which the Commissioner of Excise notified the vacancies to the Employment Exchange initiating the process of recruitment. Dates for interview were scheduled between 19.10.1994 and 23.10.1994 and dates were fixed for verification of original certificates between 25.10.1994 and 29.10.1994. Thereafter, on account of announcement of General Elections to the Legislative Assembly, recruitment process was stopped as Election Notification had been issued on 1.11.1994. By the Memo dated 21.12.1994, in the light of the decision of introducing total prohibition in the State of Andhra Pradesh, the process for recruitment of 1715 Excise Constables was cancelled. The results of the interview were not declared and no selection list was published. The respondents filed Writ Petition in the High Court in the year 1998 seeking mandamus directing the appellants to appoint










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top