SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 592

RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Rai Vimal Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ruma Pal, J.-This case relates to the assessment of the appellants holdings in Patna under the Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. A brief survey of the relevant provisions of the Act is necessary before considering the facts of the case since the appellants grievances are that the provisions of the Act have not been followed in assessing the appellants properties to tax.

3. The Act, which came into force on 15th August 1952, was passed to consolidate and amend the law relating to the municipal affairs of the town and suburbs of Patna. Section 123 of the Act allows the Corporation, with the previous approval of the State Government, to impose various taxes and fees. We are concerned with clauses (a), (b) and (c) of section 123 which provide for the imposition of property tax, water tax and latrine tax on holdings situated within Patna - the tax being assessed on the annual letting value. Section 130 provides that the annual value of a holding shall be deemed to be the gross annual rental at which the holding may reasonably be expected to let. This however is subject to rules that may be prescribed by the State Government. Any tax






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top