S.RAJENDRA BABU, G.P.MATHUR
Munna – Appellant
Versus
State (N. C. T. Of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.P. Mathur, J.-This appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short TADA ) against the judgment and order dated 26-9-1997 of Additional Designated Court II, Delhi, by which the appellant Munna and co-accused Ravi and Rakesh @ Ravi were convicted under Sections 392/120-B IPC and Section 120-B IPC and were sentenced to 7 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- under the first court and 4 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- under the second count. Ravi accused was further convicted under Section 397 IPC and Section 5 of TADA and was sentenced to 7 years R.I. under the first count and 5 years and a fine of Rs. 500/- under the second count. In default of payment of fine under each count, the accused were to undergo 3 months R.I. and all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. It appears that Ravi and Rakesh @ Ravi accused did not prefer any appeal challenging their conviction and sentence and only the appeal preferred by Munna accused is before us.
2. The case of the prosecution, as disclosed from the evidence, in brief is that PW6 Shri Prakash Bablani and his wife PW3 Smt. Sadhna Bablani were residing on the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.