SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 816

S.RAJENDRA BABU, G.P.MATHUR
Munna – Appellant
Versus
State (N. C. T. Of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.P. Mathur, J.-This appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short TADA ) against the judgment and order dated 26-9-1997 of Additional Designated Court II, Delhi, by which the appellant Munna and co-accused Ravi and Rakesh @ Ravi were convicted under Sections 392/120-B IPC and Section 120-B IPC and were sentenced to 7 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- under the first court and 4 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- under the second count. Ravi accused was further convicted under Section 397 IPC and Section 5 of TADA and was sentenced to 7 years R.I. under the first count and 5 years and a fine of Rs. 500/- under the second count. In default of payment of fine under each count, the accused were to undergo 3 months R.I. and all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. It appears that Ravi and Rakesh @ Ravi accused did not prefer any appeal challenging their conviction and sentence and only the appeal preferred by Munna accused is before us.

2. The case of the prosecution, as disclosed from the evidence, in brief is that PW6 Shri Prakash Bablani and his wife PW3 Smt. Sadhna Bablani were residing on the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top