JUDGMENT

Santosh Hegde, J.-Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant had filed a Civil Suit No. 541 of 2000 for possession of the suit scheduled property with an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, seeking injunction restraining the respondent herein from alienating the suit property and putting up any construction thereon. The trial court on the interim application filed by the appellant granted an order of temporary injunction, as prayed for.

3. The appeal filed by the respondent herein before the learned District Judge came to be allowed holding that alienation made, if any, will be subject to the law of lis pendens and constructions, if any, put by the respondent will have to be removed at his own risk and cost in the event of the suit being decreed.

4. A revision filed against the said order of the High Court came to be dismissed by the impugned order wherein the High Court recorded an oral undertaking given by the learned counsel which is as follows:

Learned counsel for the respondent, on instruction from Rajinder Dass son of Baldev Dass, on the other hand, has stated that the respondent has no intention of alienating any part of the property