SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 177

B.JAGANNATHA DAS, VIVIAN BOSE, B.K.MUKHERJEE
H. N. Rishbud – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
C.K.DAFTARY, G.N.Joshi, H.J.Umrigar, P.A.Mehta, P.G.COKHALE, RAJENDER NARAIN

Judgement

JAGANNADHADAS J.: These are appeals by Special leave against the orders of the Punjab High Court made in exercise of revisional jurisdiction, reversing the orders of the Special Judge, Delhi, quashing certain criminal proceedings pending before himself against these appellants for alleged offences under the Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. 1947. The Special Judge quashed the proceedings on the ground that the investigations on the basis of which the appellants were being prosecuted were in contravention of the provisions of subsection (4) of section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, & hence illegal. In appeal No. 95 of 1954 the appellants are two persons by name H.N. Risbud and Indar Singh. In Appeals Nos. 96 and 97 of 1954 H.N. Risbud above mentioned is the sole appellant. These appeals raise a common question of law and are dealt with together.

The appellant Risbud was the Assistant Development officer (Steel) in the office of the Directorate-General, Ministry of Industry and Supply. Government of India and the appellant. Indar Singh was the Assistant Project Section Officer (Steel) in the office of the Directorate-General, Ministry of Industry

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top