SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(SC) 64

B.P.SINHA, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE
Nathu – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.P.LAL, K.B.ASTHANA, S.P.Varma

Judgement

VENKATARAMA AYYAR J.: On 17-5-1952 Sri Nand Lal Kureel, the City Magistrate of Manipuri, returned home from court at about 5 p.m. and found his son, Sumer Singh, aged about 10 or 11 years, missing. After some fruitless search, he reported the matter to the police. On information given later that night by P. W. 26, Sri Kureel sent for Bhola, the first accused, who stated that he and the second accused, Ram Singh, had in the course of the day lured away the boy. The second accused was then sent for, and he also made similar statement. Thereupon, Sri Kureel handed them over to the police for further investigation.

At about 3 a.m. on the same night; Bhola and Ram Singh took the police, Sri Kureel & some others to any outlying garden, and at their instance, the dead body of Sumer Singh was discovered in a well in that garden. The post-mortem examination showed that death was due to asphyxia. Both the courts below have held that it was not a case of accidental drowning but of murder by strangulation; and that finding has not been disputed. The only question is, who perpetrated the crime?

2. Accused 1 and 2 were in the lock-up until 22nd May, when they were taken into jail custody.
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top