SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(SC) 100

B.P.SINHA, J.L.KAPUR, P.GOVINDA MENON
Khushal Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
J.N.BANERJI, JINDRA LAL, P.C.AGRAWAL, R.H.Dhebar

Judgment

Sinha, J. - This appeal on a certificate of fitness under Art. 134 (1) (c), granted by the High Court at Nagpur (as it then was), is directed against the concurrent judgment and orders of the Courts below, so far as the appellant Khushal is concerned, convicting and sentencing him to death under S. 302, Indian Penal Code, for the pre-mediated murder of Baboolal on the night of February 12, 1956, in one of the quarters of the city of Nagpur.

2. It appears that there are two rival factions in what has been called the Mills area in Nagpur. The appellant and Tukaram who has been acquitted by the High Court, are the leaders of one of the factions, and Ramgopal, P. W. 4, Inayatullah, P. W. 1, and Tantu, P. W. 5, are said to be the leaders of the opposite faction. Before the time and date of the occurrence, there had been a number of incidents between the two rival factions in respect of some of which, Inayatullah and Tantu aforesaid had been prosecuted.

Even on the date of the occurrence, apart from the one leading to the murder of Baboolal, which is the subject-matter of the present appeal, Tantu and Inayatullah had made two separate reports about the attacks on them by Khushal s






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top