SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 146

K.C.DAS GUPTA, K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Nandeshwar Prasad And Deoki Nandan – Appellant
Versus
U. P. Government – Respondent


Advocates:
C.B.AGARWAL, C.P.LAL, J.P.GOYAL, K.S.Hajela, P.C.AGRAWAL

Judgment

WANCHOO, J. : These two appeals on certificates granted by the Allahabad High Court raise common questions and will be dealt with together. It will be enough if we mention the facts in appeal No. 167, for the facts in the other appeal are exactly the same, except that the lands in dispute are different in the two cases, though lying in the same area in the city of Kanpur.

2. Deoki Nandan, appellant in appeal No. 167, is the lessee of two plots in Anwarganj, Bans Mandi, Kanpur, and his lease is for a period of 99 years from 1943. On these plots there exists a mill known as Om Cotton Ginning and Oil Mill. Besides the mill there are pacca godowns also on the plots and two thirds of the area is under buildings while one third is open land paved with bricks. No part of the land is waste or arable.

3. It appears that in February 1932 the Government of U. P. sanctioned by notification a scheme known as Pechbagh Delepurwa Scheme No. XX (hereinafter referred to as scheme No. XX) of the Improvement Trust Kanpur. It may be mentioned that the improvement Trust Kanpur has now been replaced by the Development Board Kanpur (hereinafter referred to as the Board) by the Kanpur Urban Area Deve
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top