1. Insurance of property against fire and river erosion — Cancellation of risk by insurer under policy condition — Dispute over validity of cancellation before loss occurred. (Para 1 , 2 )
Back
Next 
1966 Supreme(SC) 48
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J.I., K.N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, V. RAMASWAMI AND P. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, JJ.
General Assurance Society Ltd., Appellants
Versus
Chandmull Jain and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 886 of 1963.
Advocates appeared
Mr. C. B. Agarwala, Senior Advocate, (M/s. B. M. Agarwala and I. N. Shroff, Advocates), for Appellants Mr. Niren De, Additional Solicitor-General of India, (M/s. G. L. Sanghi and Nirmal Kumar Ghoshal, Advocates and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., with him), for Respondents.
Advocates:
C.B.AGARWAL, NIREN DEY
C.B.AGARWAL, NIREN DEY
A termination clause in an insurance policy allowing cancellation at will is valid and incorporated if referenced in a cover note. Such cancellation is effective provided it occurs before the insured risk has commenced or become inevitable.
Headnote:(A) Insurance Law - Standard Fire Policy - Condition 10 - Termination of policy at will - Incorporation of terms via cover notes - A cover note is a temporary and limited agreement that may incorporate by reference the terms and conditions of a future policy. Where a cover note refers to the "usual conditions of the Society's policies," the terms of the standard policy, including the right to terminate the insurance at any time on notice, are incorporated into the contract. Delay in the actual delivery of the policy does not prevent these incipient terms from governing the relationship between the parties. (Paras 10, 11, 14)
(B) Insurance Law - Validity of Termination Clause - A clause granting mutual rights to either the insurer or the insured to cancel the policy at any time is a common commercial term and is reasonable. The power of determination allows the insurer to release itself from the contract based on its own judgment to limit future liability, and such a right is not restricted to cases of "reasonable cause." (Paras 17, 18, 19)
(C) Insurance Law - Cancellation of Risk - Timing and Inevitability - A termination clause cannot be used to avoid liability for a loss that has already occurred or a risk that has become so imminent that loss is inevitable. However, if the cancellation is effected before the loss has commenced or become inevitable, the termination is valid. Whether the loss had become inevitable at the time of cancellation is a question of fact. (Paras 20, 22)
Facts of the case:
An insurance company accepted proposals to insure properties against fire and other risks, including river erosion. Cover notes were issued for a period of 30 days, stating the insurance was subject to the usual conditions of the company's policies. The company subsequently cancelled the risk via notice and endorsement. The insured contended that the cancellation was invalid because the risk of river erosion had already commenced, making it impossible to obtain alternative insurance. The properties were eventually washed away by the river shortly after the cancellation.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the terms of the standard policy, specifically the condition allowing termination at will, were incorporated into the contract through the cover notes. Based on the evidence, at the time of cancellation, the properties were still a significant distance from the river bank, and the loss had not yet commenced or become inevitable. Therefore, the company was within its rights to cancel the policy.
Issues: Whether the termination clause in the standard policy was incorporated into the contract via the cover notes; whether a clause allowing termination at will is reasonable and legally enforceable; and whether the cancellation was valid given the state of the risk at the time of notice.
Ratio Decidendi: Terms of a standard policy are incorporated into an insurance contract if the cover note refers to them. A mutual right to terminate the policy at will is a valid commercial term. Such termination is effective provided it occurs before the risk has turned into an actual loss or become inevitable.
Result: Appeal allowed.
Judgement Key Points
To construe a partition deed, which divides property among co-owners, apply these general principles of document interpretation applicable to solemn legal instruments:
-
Read holistically as an integrated whole: Examine the entire deed, including recitals, operative parts, schedules, and annexures, together to ascertain the parties' intention. References within the deed (e.g., to schedules or prior agreements) incorporate those elements. (!) (!)
-
Focus on expressed intention: Interpret according to the plain, natural meaning of the words used by the parties. Do not rewrite or imply terms to alter the expressed intent; the deed speaks for itself. (!)
-
Consider context and purpose: Evaluate in light of the transaction's commercial or familial purpose (e.g., equitable division of joint property). Established practices in property partitioning influence implied terms if not contradicted. (!) (!)
-
Presume standard form where applicable: If the deed references a customary format or "usual" partitioning terms, incorporate standard conditions prevalent in such deeds unless expressly varied. (!) (!) (!) (!)
-
Resolve doubts on substance over form: Effect must be given to the deed's substance (e.g., actual shares allotted) rather than minor formal defects, provided the division is complete and binding. (!) (!)
-
Examine timing and execution: Confirm validity by checking execution date, parties' capacity, attestation, and registration. Operative from execution unless specified otherwise. (!)
Construction prioritizes giving full effect to the division intended, avoiding absurdity or defeat of the deed's object. (!) (!)
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Applicability of cancellation clause to extended risks — Validity of termination before policy issuance — Whether cancellation occurred after risk had commenced or become inevitable. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 20 )
3. Cover notes incorporate standard policy terms — Cancellation at will is a usual condition — Termination is valid if loss is not yet inevitable. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 )
4. Insurers may exercise a right to terminate a policy at will provided the risk has not already commenced or become inevitable. (Para 19 , 20 )
5. Appeal allowed — Decree of the Divisional Bench set aside — Judgment dismissing the suit restored. (Para 23 )
6. Does a cover note referring to the usual conditions of a society's policies incorporate the terms of the future policy?
Yes. A cover note is a temporary agreement that can incorporate by reference the terms of a future standard policy. If the cover note refers to such a policy, the assured is taken to have accepted those terms, which govern the relationship even before the formal policy is delivered. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 )
7. Is a condition allowing an insurer to terminate an insurance policy at any time on notice legally valid?
Yes. Such a mutual right to cancel at will is a common and reasonable term in insurance policies. The insurer may exercise this power to release itself from future liability without needing to prove reasonable grounds to a court. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 )
8. When is a cancellation at will clause ineffective in an insurance contract?
Such a clause cannot be used to avoid liability for a loss that has already occurred or a risk that has become so imminent that loss is inevitable. However, it remains valid if exercised before the liability has commenced or become inevitable. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 )
Judgement
HIDAYATULLAH, J. : This appeal is taken from a judgment of the High Court of Calcutta, July 13 and 14, 1961, by which a Divisional Bench of the High Court, reversing the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the same Court, decreed the respondents claim for damages. The circumstances were these. The appellant is a general insurance company. On June 2, 1950 the respondents submitted proposals to the Company with a view to insuring certain houses in Dhulian bearing Holding Nos. 274, 274/A-B-C and D and 273, 273/A-B-C and D, for Rs. 51,000 and Rs. 65,000 respectively against fire and including loss or, damage by cyclone, flood and/or change of course of river or erosion of river, land-slides and subsidence. The town of Dhulian is situated on the banks of the Ganges and for several years the river had been changing its course and in 1949 a part of the town was washed away. The insurance was obviously effected with this risk in sight. The period of insurance was to be from June 3, 1950 to June 2, 1951. The Company accepted the proposals by two letters (Ex. D) on June 3, 1950 and the letters stated that in accordance with the proposals the assured was held covered under cover notes enclosed with the letters. At the back of these letters of acceptance, there was description of the houses and an endorsement which read :
"Including Cyclone, Flood and/or loss by change of course of river, diluvium and/or Erosion of River, Landslide and/or subsidence. It is further noted that there is a thatched building of residence within 50 ft. of the above premises."
Two interim protection cover notes Nos. 18848 and 18850 in respect of the two proposals were filed by the Insurance Company along with the written statement and they were said to be copies of cover notes sent with the letters of acceptance, but they bore the date June 5, 1950. There is some dispute as to whether they were at all enclosed with the reply showing acceptance of the proposals. Of the two convernotes, which are identical except for details we may read one only :
"Messrs. Chandmull Lal Chand, P. O. Dhulian Murshidabad being desirous to effect an Insurance from loss by Fire, for Rs. 51,000 on the following property viz. -
One Pucca built and roofed building (C. J. Vizandah) holding Nos. 274, 274-A, 274-B and 274-C occpd. as residence and/or shop for the storage of hydrogenated G. nut oil (vanaspati) and safety matches also situated at Dhulian Ward No. IV, District Murshidabad.
Incl. Loss or damage by cyclone, flood and/or change of course of river and/or Erosion of river, landslides and/or subsidence.
It is further noted that there is a thatched building of residence within 50 ft. of the above premises.
for one year from 3rd June, 1950 to 3rd June, 1951.
The said property is hereby held insured against damage by Fire, subject to the terms of the Applicant s proposal and the usual Condition of the Society s policies. It is, however, expressly stipulated that this protection Note cannot, under any circumstances be applicable for a longer period than Thirty Days, and that it is also immediately terminated before that date by delivery of the policy, or if the Risk be declined by the notification of such declinature.
Prem : Rs. 892-8-0 Fire at the rate of 28 as per cent.
Prem : Rs. 382-8-0 flood and other risks at the rate of 12 as per cent.
Premium : Rs. 1275-0-0."
On June 7, the assured sent the premia by cheque. As no policy was received by them, the assured wrote a letter on July 1 (Ex. A/g) asking for the policy or for extension of the cover notes. This was not done.
(2) On July 6, 1950 the Company wrote to the assured two identically worded letters (except for changes in amounts and numbers of the policies) which read :
Calcutta 6th July, 1950
.............. ..............
To,
M/s. Chandmull Lal Chand,
P. O. Dhulian,
Murshidabad.
Dear Sir,
............ ..............
............ ..............
In accordance with the inspection report lodged with this Co. we cancel the risk from 6th July,
