SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 171

J.C.SHAH, K.N.WANCHOO, R.S.BACHAWAT
Manorama S. Masurekar – Appellant
Versus
Dhanlaxmi G. Shah – Respondent


Advocates:
HATHI, K.L.Hathi, M.V.GOSWAMY, S.G.PATVARDHAN, S.T.DESAI

Judgement

BACHAWAT, J. : The question arising in this appeal by special leave is whether in a case falling under sub-s. (3) (a) of S. 12 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Act No. 57 of 1947), a tenant can claim protection from eviction by showing his readiness and willingnss to pay the arrears of rent before the date of the institution of the suit. The appellant s husband was a tenant of a flat. The rent was in arrears for a period of more than six months. On December 22, 1956, the landlord served a notice on the tenant demanding the rent. The tenant neglected to pay the rent within one month of the notice. On January11, 1957, he died. On February 4, 1957, the appellant sent the arrears of rent to the landlord by money order, but the landlord refused to accept the payment. On February 5, 1957, the landlord instituted the present suit for eviction of the appellant. The trial Court decreed the suit. The appellant filed a revision application before the Bombay High Court, but this application was dismissed by the High Court.

2. It is to be noticed that the rent was in arrears for a period of more than six months. The tenant neglected to make payment o










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top