SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 379

S.M.SIKRI, K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT
Official Trustee, W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Sachindra Nath Chatterjee – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, D.N.MUKHERJI, N.C.CHATTERJI, P.K.CHAKRAVARTI, P.K.CHATTERJI

Judgment

HEGDE, J .:- Two important questions of law arise for decision in this appeal, by certificate. It will be convenient to formulate those questions after we set out the material facts.

2. One Aswini Kumar Chatterjee (since deceased) executed the Trust deed Exh. I on December 6, 1930, in respect of some of the properties owned by him. It is provided therein (a) that the settlor would be the trustee of the Trust Estate and would enjoy the income and profits of the trust properties during his lifetime, (b) after his death his wife Smt. Santimoyee Devee and/or his sons as soon as they or any of them attain the age of majority should be the sole Trustee or Joint Trustees and (c) from and after his death the said Trust Estate should be held to the use and for the benefit of the said Smt. Santimoyee Devee and the said sons. Santimoyee Devee to be paid from the income and the profits of the said estate Rs. 50/. monthly and the balance of the Income and profits of the Trust Estate to be held for the use and benefit of each of the sons in equal shares and after the death of the said Santimoyee Devee to make over the whole of the Trust Estate to each of the sons in equal shares. He reser























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top