SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 230

V.RAMASWAMI, S.M.SIKRI
Nanak Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ghandra Kishore Aggarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :M.A. Qayoom, Advocate

Judgement

SIKRI, J.:- This appeal by certificate of fitness granted by the High Court of Delhi arises out of an application under Section 488, Criminal Procedure Code, filed on September 4, 1963, in the Court of Magistrate, 1st Class, Delhi, by four children of the respondent, Nanak Chand. The first appellant, Chandra Kishore, was born on January 23, 1942, the second, Ravindra Kishore, was born on September 23, 1943, the third Shashi Prabha, was born on February 23, 1947, and the fourth, Rakesh Kumar, was born on September 21, 1948. The first two applicants were thus majors at the time of the application, the third though a minor at the time of the application was a major on the date of the order passed by the Magistrate, i.e., on March 26, 1965. The learned Magistrate allowed the application and ordered the respondent, Nanak Chand, to pay Rs.35/- p.m. to Chandra Kishore for four months only, Rs. 35/- p.m. to Ravindra Kishore for 3 years only in case he continued his medicine studies, Rs.45/- p.m. to Shashi Prabha as her maintenance allowance and education expenses and Rs.45/- p.m. to Rakesh Kumar as his maintenance allowance and education expenses from March 26, 1965.

2. Both the ap
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top