SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 349

P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S.N.DWIVEDI
Damodar Valley Corporation – Appellant
Versus
K. K. Kar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, D.N.MUKHERJI, M.M.KSHATRIYA, V.S.DESAI

Judgment

JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J.:- On an application under Sections 9 (b) and 33 of the Arbitration Act 10 of 1940 - hereinafter called the Act - challenging the propriety of a reference to the arbitration of the sole arbitrator, the Subordinate Judge, Alipore permitted the appellant to adduce evidence to establish whether the contract was put an end to by final payment, and if it was whether the arbitration clause contained in the contract will perish with it Against this order the respondent filed a revision in the High Court of Calcutta which while setting aside the order of the Subordinate Judge dismissed the application filed by the appellant. This appeal is by certificate against that decision.

2. In order to appreciate the significance of the question which has to be determined a few relevant facts may be stated. The respondent entered into a contract with the appellant to supply, certain quantities of coal at certain price but as he failed to do so in accordance with the terms of the contract, the appellant repudiated the contract, imposed certain penalties in accordance with the terms of the contract which he later waived and ultimately paid certain sums to the respondent whi



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top