SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 58

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.H. BEG, Y.V. CHANDRACHUD AND R.S. SARKARIA, JJ.
Bava Hajee Hamsa and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Kerala, Respondent.
Criminal Appeals Nos. 197, 198 of 1970, and 18 of 1971, D/- 21-2-1974.

Advocates:
A.S.NAMBIYAR, K.T.Harindernath, Nuruddin Ahmed

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 143, 148, 302, 307, 326, 324 r/w149 - Causing death of deceases and injuries to others – Murder - Taunted and harassed them in various ways - There are two factions of Muslims in village, one of descendants of Nadiattil and Allapat families and other of lower middle class - Appellants and other co-accused belong to former faction, prosecution witnesses and faction, prosecution witnesses and deceased to latter - These factions had their own kalaries (gymnasiums wherein youngsters were given training in physical culture). A-2 (Master) of accused, while kalari of prosecution faction was run by brother of P. W. 1 in latter s compound. Rivalries existed between two factions - P. W. 12 and Ali son of deceased, both belonging to P. W. 1 s kalari, were resting in a tea shop after attending a marriage festival - Held, Only contention of learned Counsel for the appellants that remains to be considered is that if evidence of P. Ws. 1, 2, 8 and 9 was not reliable enough for convicting A-5 - whose case according to the Counsel was almost identical with that of appellants - it could not be deemed safe and sufficient for convicting the appellants – Court do not find any merit in this contention, either - Times out of number, this Court has pointed out that maxim falsus in uno falsus in omnibus should not be mechanically applied in this country - High Court acquitted A-5, only as a matter of abundant caution - It did not find that evidence of these witnesses regarding implication of A-5, was necessarily false - Appeals dismissed.

Judgment

SARKARIA, J.:- These Criminal appeals arise out of the same Judgement of the High Court of Kerala and will be disposed of by a single Judgment.

2. The four appellants, Hussanali Alikunju alias Ali, Hassanali, Adbu, Bava Hajee Mohamedali alias Mammu and Bava Hajee Hamsa (hereinafter referred to as A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 respectively) and 7 others were tried on various charges under Ss. 143, 148, 302, 307, 326, 324 read with S. 149, Penal Code for causing the death of Kochunni and Kunjeen and injuries to others in an incident on March 14, 1969 in village Veliyathunad.

3. There are two factions of Muslims in village Veliyathunad, one of the descendants of Nadiattil and Allapat families and the other of the lower middle class. Appellants and other co-accused belong to the former faction, the prosecution witnesses and faction, the prosecution witnesses and the deceased to the latter. These factions had their own kalaries (gymnasiums wherein youngsters were given training in physical culture). A-2 was the Ustad (Master) of the Kalari of the accused, while the kalari of the prosecution faction was run by the brother of P. W. 1 in the latter s compound. Rivalries existed between the two factions. On March 13, 1969, Abdu (P. W. 12) and Ali son of Kunjeen deceased, both belonging to P. W. 1 s kalari, were resting in a tea shop after attending a marriage festival. Abdul Rahim (alias) Rahiman (P. W. 13) of the kalari of the accused invited them for a game of Adi Pidi (a sort of kabadi or playful fight). Finding Ali and Abdu unwilling to play, Rahiman bullied, taunted and harassed them in various ways. When all these taunts had no effect, he brought a bamboo and poked them with it. Abdu and Ali remained intransigent. After a while, they went to their kalari and reported about this incident to their Ustad, (Kasu). The latter advised them that they should not meekly submit to such harassment, and that if they were attacked again by anybody, they should retaliate adequately. Reassured by the Ustad s advice, they returned from the kalari. Rahiman again armed with a stick and dagger confronted them. This time they commanded Rahiman in a confident tone to drop the stick and the dagger. Rahiman immediately obeyed. Abdu and Ali picked up the weapons and gave a beating to Rahiman. At the moment, Rahiman s brother, Seethi, came there and took away the former saying that the matter could be settled on the following day. Seethi then reported the matter to the faction of the accused. On the following morning, Abdu and Ali were called to the house of A-2, where they were scolded, insulted and humiliated and then directed to meet A-5 (Hassanali Hamsa) presumably to receive further chastisement; but on the advice of Kunjeen deceased, they did not do so.

4. A-2 sent for P. W. 18, V. C. Ahmmeddunny, Ex-M. P. and consulted him with regard to the future course of action. P. W. 18 suggested that A-2 should seek Police aid. A-2 did not agree.

5. The following day, the 14th March 1969, was a Friday, on which all the Muslims of the village were to assemble, as usual, at the Jumma-ath. Mosque for prayers.

6. A-5 sent for three daggers through Adima (P. W. 15). Thereafter, A-1 to A-5 took positions at a distance of 50 to 60 from the main gate of the mosque on the road. This gate opens on the main road on the northern side of the mosque. Kochunni deceased was also among those who had on that fateful day prayed at the mosque. After the prayers at about 1.45 p.m., when he came out of the main gate, A-1 charged at him and stabbed him twice on the back with a dagger. Kunju Mohd. (P. W. 1), the first cousin of the deceased, rushed to the aid of the victim when A-1 stabbed him on the back of the shoulder. Immediately thereafter, A-5 stabbed P. W. 1 causing an injury on his left palm. P. W. 1 receded to the place where Kochunni was sitting after receiving the injuries. A-2 then gave a dagger blow to Kochunni on the nose. Kochunni fell flat on the ground, P. W. 1 and ot





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top