SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 315

A.N.RAY, K.K.MATHEW, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Chitra Venkata Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, NIREN DEY, P.P.Rao

Judgment

A. N. RAY, C. J. :- This appeal is by special leave from the judgment dated 13 June, 1974 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court quashing an order of dismissal. The principal question canvassed by the Attorney General is that the High Court should not have interfered with the findings of the Tribunal.

2. The State Government in the year 1964 received certain complaints alleging misconduct against the respondent. The Director of Anti-Corruption Bureau was asked to inquire and make a report. The Government in the light of advice tendered by the vigilance Commission referred the matter to the Tribunal constituted under Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal) Act, 1960.

3. Three charges were framed against the respondent. Broadly stated the charges were that the respondent claimed false travelling allowance on certain days in the months of January, April and September, 1964. The respondent denied the charges and submitted a written statement on 4 November, 1968. The Tribunal made inquiries and on 9 December, 1968 recommended dismissal of the respondent from the service.

4. The Government thereafter gave a notice to the respondent on 22 February, 1969 to show ca
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top