SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 179

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND N.L. UNTWALIA, JJ.
State of Orissa etc., Appellants
 
Versus
 
Shri Arun Kumar Patnaik and another etc., etc., Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1739 to 1742 of 1974
 
Decided on 15-4-1976.
Advocates appeared
 Mr. G. Rath, Advocate General, Orissa, Mr. Gobind Das, Sr. Advocate. (Mr. B. Parthasarathi, Advocate with them), for Appellants and Respondent No. 2 in Civil Appeals Nos. 1739-41 of 1974: Mr. V. S. Desai, Sr. Advocate with him), for Respondent No. 1.

Advocates:
B.PARTHASARTHY, G.RATHI, GOBIND DAS, V.S.DESAI, Vinod Bhagat

Headnote:

Government of India Act, 1935 - clause (b) of sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 241 - Quashing certain orders - Public Service - Group of 4 appeals arising out of a judgment of the High Court of Orissa. Civil Appeals Nos. are filed by State of Orissa while Civil Appeals are filed by - Two writ petitions were filed in Orissa High Court, one by Arun Kumar Patnaik and other by for quashing certain orders and notifications issued by Government of Orissa in regard to appointment as an Assistant Engineer and his subsequent promotions to higher posts - Assistant Engineers on contract basis for a period of 3 years - Appointments were made by direct recruitment on recommendation of Public Service Commission which held a test and a viva voce examination in accordance with Orissa Service of Engineers Rules, took charge of the post which was during the currency of contractual period of 3 years, the Government of Orissa informed him that the question of absorbing him in the regular establishment of the States Engineering Service – Held, High Court made light of this long and inexplicable delay with a casual remark that the contention was without any force - It overlooked that in June, 1974 it was setting aside an appointment dated March 1962 of a person who had in the meanwhile risen to the rank of a Superintending Engineer. Those 12 long years were as if writ in water. We cannot but express our grave concern that an extraordinary jurisdiction should have been exercised in such an abject disregard of consequences and in favour of persons who were unmindful of their so-called rights for many long years - Appeals allowed

JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, J.:— This is a group of 4 appeals arising out of a judgment dated June 10, 1974 of the High Court of Orissa. Civil Appeals Nos. 1739 and 1740 are filed by the State of Orissa while Civil Appeals Nos. 1741 and 1742 are filed by one T. C. Krishna Moorthy. Two writ petitions were filed in the Orissa High Court, one by Arun Kumar Patnaik and the other by Niranjan Mishra for quashing certain orders and notifications issued by the Government of Orissa in regard to Krishna Moorthys appointment as an Assistant Engineer and his subsequent promotions to higher posts. Patnaik and Mishra challenged Krishna Moorthys appointment and prayed that in any event they ought to be accorded seniority over him.

2. By an order dated December 11, 1958 Krishna Moorthy and two others were appointed as "temporary Assistant Engineers on contract basis for a period of 3 years." The appointments were made by direct recruitment on the 1641 recommendation of the Public Service Commission which held a test and a viva voce examination in accordance with the Orissa Service of Engineers Rules, 1941. Krishna Moorthy took charge of the post on January 19, 1959. On September 13, 1960 which was during the currency of the contractual period of 3 years, the Government of Orissa informed him that the question of absorbing him in the regular establishment of the States Engineering Service will be taken up for consideration on his completion of 2 years of service and in case he was absorbed, his absorption would be given retrospective effect from the date of his first appointment as an Assistant Engineer. The Government of Orissa thereafter consulted the Public Service Commission and after obtaining its concurrence, it passed an order dated March 14, 1962 regularizing Krishna Moorthys service by absorbing him in the regular cadre of an Assistant Engineer retrospectively from January 19, 1959. That order is Annexure II to the Writ Petitions. On September 21, 1962 Krishna Moorthy was promoted as an Executive Engineer (Annexure III); on November 15, 1968 he was confirmed as an Assistant Engineer with effect from February 27, 1961 (Annexure IV); on May 12, 1969 he was confirmed as an Executive Engineer with effect from December 2, 1967; and on November 23, 1973 he was promoted as a Superintending Engineer (Annexure VII). Patnaik and Mishra challenged the validity of the orders at Annexures II, III, IV and VII to the writ petitions.

3. These are the relevant dates in regard to Krishna Moorthys appointment. In regard to the appointments of Patnaik and Mishra, it would be enough to recapitulate facts relating to Patnaiks appointment, because for the purpose of deciding these appeals there is no distinction between those facts and the facts of Mishras case. On April 14, 1960 Patnaik was appointed "on provisional basis to act as temporary Assistant Engineer" by direct recruitment, which was about a year and 4 months after Krishna Moorthys initial appointment as a temporary Assistant Engineer on contract basis. On November 15, 1968 Patnaik was confirmed as an Assistant Engineer with effect from May 2, 1962. (It may be recalled that by an order of even date Krishna Moorthy was confirmed as an Assistant Engineer with effect from February 27, 1961). On October 31, 1970 Patnaik was confirmed as an Executive Engineer with effect from December 2, 1967. (It may be recalled that Krishna Moorthy was confirmed as an Executive Engineer with effect from the same date viz., December 2, 1967 though by an earlier order dated May 12, 1969.)

4. On June 19, 1970 Patnaik filed a representation to the State Government claiming seniority over Krishna Moorthy. On April 16, 1973 Patnaik filed a memorial to the Governor of Orissa for restoration of his seniority. On May 29, 1973 Patnaik and Mishra filed writ petitions in the High Court questioning the validity of Krishna Moorthys absorption in the regular cadre by the order of March 14, 1962 as also his subsequent promotions and seniori


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top