SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 336

P.N.BHAGWATI, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Nand Ballabh Pant – Appellant
Versus
State (Union Territory Of Delhi) – Respondent


Judgment

BHAGWATI, J.:- We have gone through the evidence in this case and we are satisfied that there is no reason to interfere with the conviction recorded against the appellant for the offence under Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code. The sentence which has been imposed on the appellant has been progressively reduced and ultimately the appellant has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-. We think that having regard to the special facts and circumstances of the present case, it would meet the ends of justice if the sentence of imprisonment is reduced to one month and in lieu thereof, the fine is enhanced to Rs. 1,000/-.

2. We accordingly allow the appeal only in regard to sentence and reduce the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the appellant from two months to one months rigorous imprisonment and in lieu thereof, enhance the sentence of fine from Rs. 500/- to Rs. 1,000/- with a direction that in default of payment of fine, the appellant will suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one month. We are told that the appellant has already deposited a sum of Rs. 1,000/- in respect of the sentence of fine which had been impos



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top