SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 216

A.D.KOSHAL, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Surajdeo Ojha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

FAZAL ALI, J.: - In this appeal by special leave, the appellants have been convicted under Ss. 326/34 and 326/149 and have been sentenced to R. I. for seven years as modified by the High Court. They were also convicted under S. 148 and sentenced to three years R. I. We have gone through the Judgment of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and we do not find any error of law in this case.

2. The central evidence in this case consists of a dying declaration made by the deceased before the Sub-Inspector which has been treated as F. I. R. The dying declaration was made within an hour of the assault when the deceased was fully conscious. Both the Courts below have relied upon the dying declaration and have held that the dying declaration is true. All the appellants are named in the dying declaration and even the witnesses Nos. 1 and 3 have been mentioned clearly as having seen the occurrence, in the said dying declaration. These witnesses have also been believed by the Courts below.

3. Mr. Mookherjee appearing in support of the appeal submitted that having regard to the large number of injuries sustained by the deceased, he would not be in a position to speak or give dyi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top