SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 244

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI, BAHARUL ISLAM AND V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, JJ.
Maqsoodan and others, Appellants
Versus
State of U.P., Respondent
Criminal Appeals Nos. 175 and 367-369 of 1974 D/- 15-12-1982.
AND
State of U.P., Appellant
Versus
Maqsoodan etc., Respondents. 127
Advocates appeared
Mr. Rajendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. R. K. Garg, Sr. Advocate, M/s B. P. Singh, Ranjit Kumar, Advocates with them, for Appellants; Mr. O. P. Rana, Sr. Advocate, Mr. M. V. Goswami, Advocate with him, for the Complainant; Mr. Dalveer Bhandari, Advocate, for Respondent.

Advocates:
B.P.SINGH, DALVIR BHANDARI, M.V.GOSWAMY, O.P.RANA, R.K.GARG, RAJENDRA SINGHVI, RANJIT GHOSAL

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302/149 and 307/149 – Offence of Murder – Appeal against conviction - According to prosecution, accused persons were variously armed with Ballams, Pharsas and lathis. Another group of twelve or thirteen persons who were associates of accused was standing at Vishram Ghat and someone was constantly inciting accused persons with the expression, "kill, kill" whereupon accused persons attacked and assaulted Jadon, Vijay Kumar, Rajendra and Sulley. Jadon and P. W. 3 were severely injured - Condition of Jadon was very precarious - After assault, miscreants left. P. W. 1 arranged for a lorry belonging to one Vishnu Chaubey and carried injured persons to District Hospital - Driver of the lorry was one Than Singh., Jadon and P. W. 3 were removed to operation theatre - Thereafter, P. W. 1 proceeded to Police Station, Kotwali at Mathura and submitted a written First Information Report (FIR) about incident - Held, As number of accused persons present and participating in occurrence have not been proved to be five or more,High Court has rightly held that common object necessary for constituting an unlawful assembly has not been proved, and therefore in facts and circumstances of case, High Court correctly held that common intention has not been proved and as such four appellants were rightly acquitted of offence under Section 302 read with Section 149 I. P. C., and also rightly acquitted all other accused persons of the offences under Sections 147 and 148, I. P. C - It is subjective But it can be inferred facts and circumstances - In this case, appellants were related - All of them were armed with deadly weapons - They were together - There was an order by someone, "kill, kill", when all of them simultaneously attacked deceased and P. Ws.1, 2, 3 and C. W. 1. After occurrence, they left together; they were later arrested from same place - Therefore, affirm conviction and sentences inflicted by High Court - Criminal Appeal and dismissed.

Judgment

BAHARUL ISLAM, J.:- These four Criminal Appeals are by special leave. Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 1974 is by the four appellants - Maqsoodan, Madan Mohan, Prayagnath and Nando who have been convicted under Sections 302/34 and 307/34 Penal Code.

2. The material facts may be briefly stated as follows :

On 8-6-1972 at about 5-45 or 6-00 a. m., when Sulley (P. W. 1) along with his brother, Jadon (deceased), his son, Rajendra (C. W. 1) and his nephew Vijai Kumar (P. W. 3) were going from their house in Neem. Gali, Mathura, to their Dharamshala in Mohalla Bengali Ghat, via Vishram Ghat and reached the area called Shyam Ghat, they were waylaid by the twelve persons accused in the case and were assaulted, According to the prosecution, the accused persons were variously armed with Ballams, Pharsas and lathis. Another group of twelve or thirteen persons who were associates of the accused was standing at Vishram Ghat and someone was constantly inciting the accused persons with the expression, "kill, kill" whereupon the accused persons attacked and assaulted Jadon, Vijay Kumar, Rajendra and Sulley. Jadon and P. W. 3 were severely injured. The condition of Jadon was very precarious. After the assault, the miscreants left. P. W. 1 arranged for a lorry belonging to one Vishnu Chaubey and carried the injured persons to the District Hospital. The driver of the lorry was one Than Singh., Jadon and P. W. 3 were removed to the operation theatre. Thereafter, P. W. 1 proceeded to the Police Station, Kotwali at Mathura and submitted a written First Information Report (FIR) about the incident. The FIR was written by his nephew, Prakash Chandra Chaturvedi (P. W. 8). The FIR was lodged at 6-30 a. m. at the Police Station and has been proved in this case as "Ka-16". After lodging the FIR, P. W. 1 came back to the hospital where the injuries of all the four injured persons were examined by Dr. B. S. Babbar. As the condition of the injured persons was serious, intimation was sent to Shri U. C. Tripathi (D. W. 7), Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sahabad, for recording their statements. The Magistrate came and recorded the statements of P. W. 3 and C. W. 1 at 9-15 a. m. and 9-20 a. m. respectively. Jadon was operated upon and his condition was such that he could not make any statement. In fact, he succumbed to the injuries the next day, namely, 9-6-1972 at 3-25 p. m. The post-mortem examination was conducted on the dead body of Jadon by Dr. B. S. Babbar on 10-6-1972 at 10-00 a. m.

3. The police after investigation submitted charge-sheet against the twelve accused persons, all of whom pleaded not guilty. The First Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, who tried the case, convicted eleven out of the twelve accused persons and acquitted accused No. 12, Kanhaiya. Appellant Maqsoodan was convicted under Section 302, I. P. C. and sentenced to death. The other ten accused persons were convicted under Sections 302/149 and 307/149 I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life, each under Section 302/149 Penal Code. Accused Parmatma was convicted under Section 147 I. P. C. and the rest were convicted under Section 148 I. P. C. They were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. The sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently. There was also a reference for the confirmation of the death sentence imposed on Maqsoodan.

4. The convicts filed several appeals before the High Court of Allahabad. The High Court altered the convictions of Maqsoodan Madan Mohan, Prayagnath and Nando, from under Sections 302/149 and 307/149 to ones under Sections 302/34 and 307/34 Penal Code. The sentence of death imposed on Maqsoodan was reduced to imprisonment for life. All of them were acquitted of the offences under Section 147 or Section 148 I. P. C. The convictions and sentences as against the other six accused persons were set aside and they were acquired. The acquittal of Kanahaiya was affirmed. Criminal Appeals Nos. 367, 368 and 369 of 1974 have been filed by the State



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top