SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 228

D.A.DESAI, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Welcome Hotel – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.Kanta Rao, J.ESVARA PRASAD, L.M.SINGHVI, LATA KRISHNAMURTHY, Laxmikant Pandey, M.S.GANESH, T.V.S.N.Chari

Judgment

DESAI. J.:- Should Art. 32 of the Constitution lend its assistance to petitioners in this group of petitions so that the poor in Andhra Pradesh can be successfully deprived of their staple simple breakfast? Even an imaginary marginal dent in the profits of the hoteliers stirs it into action by an easy resort to a writ petition under Art. 32 and an ex parte stay which itself is success even if the petition ultimately fails, because in the meantime the measure which may possibly affect their profits is kept. under suspended animation and the profit being continuously derived from scattered consumers is not refundable and the unjust enrichment is enjoyed with impunity. This case amply illustrates the point.

2. Hoteliers of Andhra Pradesh raised a hue and cry when the Government of Andhra Pradesh- the first respondent enacted and proclaimed in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act. 1955 (1955 Act for short) read with the notification of the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation dated June 9, 1978. the Andhra Pradesh catering Establishments (Fixation and Display of Prices of Foodstuffs) Order. 1978 (1978 Order for short) dated September

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top