O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.B.MISRA
Mohammad Ghouse Sahib – Appellant
Versus
Muhammad Kuthubudin Sahib – Respondent
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :- The defendants who had failed in a suit brought under section 92 C. P. C. are the appellants in this Appeal The appeal however is not against the decree passed in the suit under S. 92 C. P. C. but is directed against the order overruling the defendants! objections. in execution proceedings. The objection was that though the suit under S. 92 C. P.C. was filed before the passing of the Wakf Act the decree had been passed subsequent to the coming into force of the Act and was therefore, void. We see no force in the objection raised by the defendants. It is true that while the Wakf Act came into force in the State of Tamil Nadu in 1956, the decree framing the scheme for the Wakf was passed in 1961 but that does not render the decree void and unenforceable. As we said, this suit had been instituted prior to the coming into force of the Wakf Act. Section 55 of the Wakf Act shows that suits under S. 92 of C. P. C. continue to be maintainable even after the passing of the Act except that the consent of the Board has to be obtained for the institution of such a suit if the suit is filed by some person other than the Board Section 57(1) provides that in every s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.