SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 771

K.N.SINGH, RANGANATH MISRA
Charan Lal Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, C.L.SAHU, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, M.S.GANESH

Judgment

ORDER:- This application has been filed by an Advocate of this Court by way of a public interest litigation. It had been listed earlier and learned Attorney General had entered appearance on behalf of the Union of India.

2. We have heard the petitioner. It has been couched in unsavoury language and the petitioner seems to have made an intentional attempt to indulge in mudslinging against the advocates, this Court in particular as also other constitutional institutions. Many of the allegations in his writ petition are likely to lower the prestige of this Court as the apex judicial institution. At one place in the writ petition, he has alleged :-

"Thus the working of the Judges are cocktail based on Western Common Laws and American techniques, as such unproductive and out-dated according to socio-economic conditions of the country."

At one another place, the petitioner has stated that:-

"This Court has become a constitutional liability without having control over the illegal acts of the Government...........Thus the people for whom the Constitution is meant have now turned down their faces against it which is a disillusionment for fear that justice is a will of the wisp."

Yet at








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top