SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 117

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, KULDIP SINGH
D. P. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
ANIL DEV SINGH, ASHOK MAHAJAN, C.V.SUBBA RAO, G.D.GUPTA, Indra Sawhney, R.VENKATARAMANA, SUSHMA SURI

JUDGMENT

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY,J.:— These two appeals by special leave raise the question of determination of seniority of the appellants in the cadre of Lower Division Clerks. The appeals are preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated March 5, 1982 in LPA No. 125 of 1981.

2. The appellants were originally recruited as Civilian School Masters or L.D.Cs., Leading Hand (Technical), etc. either in the Lower Defence Installations comprising Ordnance Factories, Ordnance Depots, Workshops, Regimental Centres, Units, Command Headquarters, etc. under the control of Army Headquarters, New Delhi. Some of the appellants were declared as surplus in those establishments and they came to be posted/transferred to the Armed Forces Headquarters and inter-service organisations as LDCs. Their posting/ transfer was done in the public interest. They joined the service in the Armed Force Headquarters on various dates between 1960 and 1964. Some of them were later promoted as Upper Division Clerks. While they were thus continuing in service, rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution known as "The Armed Forces Headquarters Clerical Service Rules, 1968 ("The Rules") w









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top