SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 229

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, R.M.SAHAI
A. P. Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
B. Sarat Chandra – Respondent


Judgment

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.- This is an appeal by the A.P. Public Service Commission against the decision of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal dated September 22, 1989. The appeal raises a question as to the scope of Rule 5 of the A.P. Police Service Rules, 1966.

2. The facts are not in dispute and may be stated as follows : The Public Service Commission issued an Advertisement/Notification No. 18/1983 inviting applications for selection in a Combined Competitive Examination to be held in November 1983 at Anantapur, Guntur, Hyderabad, Kakinada, Tirupathi, Visakhapatanam and Warangal Centres for recruitment to the posts included in Grade I Services. The notification was published in the gazette dated August 25,1983. The post of Deputy Superintendent of Police was one of the posts for which applications were invited. The respondent applied to that post as well as to other posts. The minimum age prescribed for selection to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police was 21 years as on July 1, 1983, as against 18 years for other posts. The respondent did not complete 21 years as on July 1,1983. He was short by 19 days and his case, therefore, was not considered for appointment to









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top