SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 219

J.S.VERMA, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, V.RAMASWAMI
U. P. State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Ismail – Respondent


Advocates:
PREM MALHOTRA, RAJU RAMACHANDRAN

JUDGMENT

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:— We grant special leave and proceed to dispose of these appeals.

2. These appeals preferred against the decision of the Allahabad High Court raise common questions as to the scope of Regns. 17(2) and 17(3) of the U. P. State Road Transport Corporation Employees (Other Than Officers) Service Regulations, 1981 (the Regulations).

3. The respondents were appointed as drivers in the erstwhile U. P. Government Roadways. Upon the formation of the U. P. State Road Transport Corporation (Corporation) they were absorbed in the services of the Corporation. The Corporation has framed the Regulations inter alia prescribing medical test to drivers every year for the purpose of assessing their suitability for the job. Pursuant to these Regulations, the Managing Director of the Corporation issued a circular dated December 19, 1986 stating that all drivers should be medically examined and those found unsuitable either because of ill-health or poor eye-sight, be not given duty and their services be dispensed with. This was followed by another circular dated March 12, 1987 by which the Managing Director directed the Regional Managers to terminate the services of the d




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top