SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. PUNCHHI AND S.C. AGRAWAL, JJ.
Venkateshwara Theatre, Appellant
Versus
State of A.P. and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 1527 of 1986 (with S.L.P. (C) No. 3127 of 1985; C.A. Nos. 4798 of 1989, 223 of 1985 and 1858 of 1992 etc.etc.)
Decided on 10-5-1993.
Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 4 and 5 - Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 - Section 4-C - Levy of taxes - Special leave - Composition scheme contemplated - Compound tax payable - Gross collection capacity per show was defined in Explanation to Section 4-C to mean notional aggregate of all payments for admission proprietor would realise per show if all seats or accommodation as determined by licensing authority under Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 in respect of place of entertainment are occupied and calculated at maximum rate of payments for admission as determined by said licensing authority - Levy of tax in manner as prescribed under Section 4-C could be dispensed with if proprietor of theatre opted for composition scheme contemplated by Section 5 where under it was open to a proprietor to enter into an agreement with prescribed authority to compound tax payable under Section 4C for a fixed sum which was to be arrived at in accordance with formula prescribed – Held, In instant case Court find that legislature has prescribed different rates of tax by classifying theatres into different classes air-conditioned air-cooled ordinary permanent and semi-permanent and touring and temporary - Theatres have further been categorized on basis of type of local area in Which they are situate - It cannot therefore be said that there has been no attempt on part of legislature to classify cinema theatres taking into consideration differentiating circumstances for purpose of imposition of tax - Grievance of appellants is that classification is not perfect - What they want is that there should have been further classification amongst theatres falling in same class on basis of location of the theatre in each local area - Court do not think that such a contention is well founded - Appeals dismissed
JUDGMENT
S. C. AGRAWAL, J. :—These appeals and special leave petition raise common questions relating to the constitutional validity of Sections 4 and 5 of the Andhra, Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), as amended by Act 24 of 1984, providing for imposition of entertainments tax in respect of entertainments held in cinema theatres located in the State of Andhra Pradesh.
2. The Act has been enacted to provide for the levy of taxes on amusements and other entertainments. Prior to January 1, 1984, Section 4 of the Act provided for levy of entertainment tax at a rate fixed on the basis of percentage of the payment made by a person for admission to any entertainment. In addition, there was a provision in Section 4-A for levy of a fixed amount, by way of "show tax", for each show. By Act 58 of 1976, Section 4-C was introduced in the Act and Section 5 of the Act was substituted. Under Section 4C, it was provided that in respect of entertainments held within the jurisdiction of any local authority whose population did not exceed 25,000, a tax for every entertainment show would be levied, not on the basis of each payment for admission, but at a certain percentage of the gross collection capacity per show. The percentages for such levy were fixed according to the population of the local authority within the jurisdiction of which the entertainments were held. Gross collection capacity per show was defined in the Explanation to Section 4-C to mean the notional aggregate of all payments for admission the proprietor would realise per show, if all the seats or accommodation as determined by the licensing authority under the Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 in respect of the place of entertainment are occupied, and calculated at the maximum rate of payments for admission as determined by the said licensing authority. The levy of tax in the manner as prescribed under Section 4-C could be dispensed with if the proprietor of the theatre opted for the composition scheme contemplated by Section 5 whereunder it was open to a proprietor to enter into an agreement with the prescribed authority to compound the tax payable under Section 4C for a fixed sum which was to be arrived at in accordance with the formula prescribed under Section 5. According to this formula, the tax was payable on the basis of a percentage of the gross collection capacity per show for the fixed rounds of shows for the whole year and the number of shows was fixed on the basis of the number of shows exhibited in the previous year. This arrangement continued till December 31, 1983, whereafter the provisions of Sections 4, 4-A and 5 were amended by Act No. 24 of 1984.
3. The provisions of Sections 4, 4-A and 5, as amended by Act 24 of 1984, were as follows :
"Section 4.(1) There shall be levied and paid to the State Government a tax on the gross collection capacity on every show (hereinafter referred to as the entertainments tax) in respect of entertainments held in the theatres specified in column (2) of the table below and located in the located areas specified in the corresponding entry in column (1) of the said table, calculated at the rates specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) thereof.
THE TABLE
Local Area Theatre Rate of tax on the gross collection capacity per show
(1) (2) (3)
(a) Municipal corporations and the Secunderabad cantonment area and the contiguous area of two kilometres thereof. (i) Air-conditioned 29 percent
(ii) Air-cooled 28 percent
(iii) Ordinary (other than air-conditioned and air-cooled) 25 percent
(b) Selection grade municipalities and the contiguous area of two kilometres thereof. (i) Air-conditioned 28 percent
(ii) Air-cooled 27 percent
(iii) Ordinary (other than air-conditioned and air-cooled) 24 percent
(c) Special grade municipalities and contiguous area of two kilometres thereof. (i) Air-conditioned 27 percent
(ii) Air-cooled 26 percent
(iii) Ordinary (other than air-conditioned and air-co
relied on : Western India Theatres v. Cantonment Board
Y.V. Srinivasamurthy v. State of Mysore
State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala
referred to : K.T. Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala
relied on : President of India v. In re The Special courts Bill 1978
Khandige Sham Bhat v. Agricultural I.T.O.
East India Tobacco Co. v. State of A.P.
P.M. Ashwathanarayana Shetty v. State of Karnataka
Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Association of India v. Union of India
Kerala Hotel and Restaurant Association v. State of Kerala
Cannon Dunkerley and Co. v. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.