SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BEFORE S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, S.C. AGRAWAL, S. MOHAN, B.P. JEEVAN REDDY AND S.P. BHARUCHA, JJ.
UNNIKRISHNAN P.J. AND OTHERS
Versus
STATE OF A.P. AND OTHERS .
Review Petition Nos. 483 of 1993 in Writ Petition No. 678 of 1993 ...Etc.
Decided on 14-5-1993
Non-Resident Indian Students - Admission to Professional Colleges - Modification of Scheme
Fact of the Case:
The court modified the scheme to allow professional colleges to admit Non-Resident Indian students to the extent of only five percent of their total intake for a given year, with specific conditions for admission and fees.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that Non-Resident Indian students could be admitted on the basis of merit, with the management of the college judging their merit based on relevant factors. Non-Resident Indian students admitted against these seats need not take the entrance examination prescribed for admission to the course.
Issues: The issue was the modification of the scheme to allow admission of Non-Resident Indian students to professional colleges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the admission of Non-Resident Indian students to professional colleges to the extent of five percent of the total intake, with specific conditions for admission and fees, and modified the observations made in a previous case in relation to Non-Resident Indian students.
Final Decision: The court dismissed all review petitions and applications, with no costs imposed.
ORDER
1. The Scheme framed by this Court in its judgment dated February 4, 1993 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 607 of 1992{Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of A.P., (1993) 1 SCC 645} and connected matters is modified to the following extent only.
2. It shall be open to the professional college to admit Non-Resident Indian students to the extent of only five per cent of their total intake for a given year. By way of illustration if the permitted intake of a professional college is 100 for a given year, 50 seats out of it will be free seats and other 50 seats will be seats on payment. The five seats for Non-Resident Indian students shall be out of the 50 payment seats. The Non-Resident Indian students shall be admitted on the basis of merit. But in view of the different backgrounds they come from it is for the management of the college concerned to judge the merit of these candidates, having regard to the relevant factors. The fees payable by such students shall be as may be prescribed by the Committee referred to in clause (6) of the Scheme.
3. The Non-Resident Indian students admitted against these 5 seats need not however take the entrance examination, if any prescribed for admission to that course. It is made clear that the above provision does not preclude the Non-Resident Indian students from seeking admission either to free seats or payment seats along with others on the basis common to all. The observations made in Mohini Jain case{Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, (1992) 3 SCC 666} in relation to Non-Resident Indian students will stand modified to the above extent.
4. Subject to the above, all the review petitions and I As are dismissed. No costs.
For Citation: (1993) 4 SCC 111
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.