SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 673

A.M.AHMADI, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
O. P. Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Indian Tourism Development Corpn. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N.Mishra, G.B.Rai, K.G.Bhagat, O.C.MATHUR

Judgment

VENKATACHALA, J.:- Appellant in Civil Appeal No. 1969 of 1986, Applicant in C.M.P. No. 7806 of 1987 and Complainant in C.M.P. No. 14358 of 1989 is one and the same person, i.e., O.P. Bhandari - Bhandari, while respondent in them is Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. -I.T.D.C.

2. Bhandari was in the employment of the I.T.D.C. as a Manager of its hotel Ranjit. However, his services were terminated by the I.T.D.C. by its Order dated 18-9-1984. The sustainability of that termination order was questioned in Civil Appeal No. 1969 of 1986 filed by Bhandari in this Court. That appeal was allowed by this Court by its Judgment dated 29-9-1986 (reported in AIR 1987 SC 111 at p. 116). The decretal order thereunder read thus :-

"We, therefore, direct that :

I. The respondent-Corporation shall reinstate the appellant with full back-wages (including usual allowances), or, at its option,

II. The respondent-Corporation shall pay the Income-tax Officer shall on an application to the appellant :-

(1) Salary including usual allowances for the period commencing from the date of termination of his service under the impugned order till the date of payment of compensation equivalent to 333 yea




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top