SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1127

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, K.RAMASWAMY
Government Of Andhra Prades – Appellant
Versus
A. V. Venugopala Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
B.Kanta Rao, G.Prabhakar, K.Madhava Reddy

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. In the impugned order dated 28-4-1994, the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 6190 of 1993 directed that the direction issued by the Tribunal "will not preclude the authorities from putting an existing Executive Engineer in additional charge of the post of Executive Engineer or an existing Superintending Engineer similarly wherever required. The Committee also will examine the aspect that where there are no controversies, the consideration of promotion of Executive Engineers should be placed before the Tribunal for any further directions. Any in charge arrangements to the posts of Executive Engineers, Superintending Engineers or Chief Engineers made after interim order, are revoked and they stand divested of that charge, within one week." This part of the order is now mainly assailed in this appeal. Before issuing of notice to the respondent by our proceedings dated 13-7-1994, Shri K. Madhava Reddy, learned Senior Counsel had stated that pending finalisation of the seniority list, the in-charge arrangement was made to keep senior most in the provisional list of the respective divisions who are eligible for promotion to the post of Executive En


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top